In State v. Sandy and Surpris, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ____, COA15-996, (2016) our court of appeals vacated drug dealing convictions against Barshiri Sandy and Henry Surpris. The COA found out via a motion for appropriate relief that a Wake Assistant District Attorney and a Raleigh Police Officer knew their star witness was a drug dealer. Further, they memorialized their knowledge in an email chain on the ADA's private email account rather than her government email. That allowed her to avoid giving the information of their star witness' involvement in the drug trade to the defense. Worse, for the ADA, she allowed her star witness to testify at trial that he was not involved in the drug trade!
The defendants Sandy and Surpris, denied involvement in drug dealing, claiming that the witness was lying. Of course, without the information to impeach him, information well known to the prosecutor in the court room, their lawyers were unable to convince the jury that the state's witness was lying and their clients were telling the truth. A conviction ensued. Unfortunately, for the Wake D.A.'s office, the federal government was about to indict their witness and his involvement in the drug trade come out. But, the real surprise was the emails between the ADA and the RPD keeping that fact a secret from the defense and denying them the opportunity to effectively cross examine the witness.
The COA did the right thing, it followed the law and vacated the convictions. Wake's elected DA, Lorrin Freeman, when she found out, put ADA Colleen Janssen on paid leave so that an investigation could be conducted. While the COA did not name Janssen, your intrepid blogger, through a confidential source, found out that it was Janssen who used her own email account and was the prosecutor in the Sandy and Srupris case at trial. Janssen has now resigned and is, appropriately, facing an inquiry from the NC Bar. I have known Colleen Janssen for many years, and this brings me no pleasure to report. However, you cannot use a private email account to hide information in a criminal trial without consequences. The defendant's right to a fair trial demands the state and its agents be accountable for their misconduct.
Walt-in-Durham
