Well, dear readers, Sid has done it again. He's filed a lawsuit that has elicited a 12(b) motion. That means the defendant does not think that, if the court takes everything Sid has claimed as true, he still has not plead a viable cause of action. The state is right. You can read about it here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7z91VniTzKQU3VpdS1ONFBvWlU/view?usp=sharing
Walt
Sunday, June 26, 2016
Monday, June 6, 2016
Harr III motions and order
Well, Sid continues his string of frivolous filings. He posted this response to the U.S. District Court's order to show cause.
The court, as you might surmise was less than amused. The judge denied Sid's frivolous motion to disqualify pointing out that a disagreement about the law is not grounds to disqualify a judge. You can read all about it here.
It is worth noting that the court has ordered Sid to appear and show cause.
Walt-in-Durham
The court, as you might surmise was less than amused. The judge denied Sid's frivolous motion to disqualify pointing out that a disagreement about the law is not grounds to disqualify a judge. You can read all about it here.
It is worth noting that the court has ordered Sid to appear and show cause.
Walt-in-Durham
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)